Friday, November 30, 2018

The Bourgeois and the Godmother Hoff

I have no idea what to make of this. All I can say is that the interconnectedness of people is
dazzling. Here’s a tiny, convoluted example.

Before I start, let me provide the absolute basic facts. In 1781, Michel BOURGEOIS and Joanna
FLURY had a son, Michael. Michael 1781 is my great great great grandfather. HIS grandparents
are Michel BOURGEOIS and Eva BECK. In 1866, Michael’s (1781) grandson, Francis Joseph
BUSHU married Agatha BURKEY who was the granddaughter of an absolute family icon, Anne
Marie HOFF. Francis BUSHU is my great grandfather. Anna Marie is my great great great
grandmother on the BURKEY side.

Michel Bourgeois 1761> Michael Bourgeois 1781> Morand Bourgeois > Francis Bushu >
Herbert Bushu > Pauline Bushu > me.

Michael BOURGEOIS and Joanna had a second son in 1785; Morand. Morand and his family
came to the US several years after his older brother. The descendants of both men have been
traced although Michael’s is much more accurate than Morand’s, thanks to a gifted researcher
named Lester BUSHUE.

But this piece isn’t just about the BUSHUS; it’s about the HOFFS. Ages ago when I started
genealogy, I traced the BUSHU family back to Mertzen, Haut Rhin, Alsace, France, where they
were BOURGEOIS. A few years later, dabbling about in the Alsace archives late one night, I
bumped into the HOFF name. Now that was interesting because the gifted man who traced
Anne Marie’s (remember her? Family icon) descendants had been stopped cold at the Atlantic
ocean. But late that night, doodling along, I found a promising HOFF reference and pursued it.
I’ve written a blog piece about finding her, so I won’t repeat the details of that search. But I will
mention that we were very surprised to learn that this woman who married a pretty prominent
man from Switzerland was from tiny Mertzen. But she was, and I chased her ancestry all the
way back to 1600 or so.

Shifting gears now. A while ago, a man I’ll call Steven (because that’s his name) contacted me.
He was interested in the Morand BOURGEOIS 1785 line. We corresponded, and eventually he
asked for, and I sent, the original contemporaneous, primary records for the family in France. He
is wonderful; he double-checked the presence of and accuracy for every source I had claimed,
finding some errors and then determining that I was missing five records. I ascertained I didn’t
have them, logged onto my favorite French website, CRHF, and ordered the missing
documents. Four of those arrived a few days ago, and I, looking for anything to do that would
distract me from some routine tree maintenance, sat down to see what was to be gleaned from
these jewels.

And there, lo and behold, I learned that the Godparents of Joanny, son of Michel BOURGEOIS
and Eva BECK were Joanis CONRAD and Anna Marie HOOFF. (HOOFF is one of the ways the
various priests and officials spell the HOFF name.) In Mertzen. Where my 3g grandmother,
Anne Marie, is from. Huh! They have to be related, right? Mertzen is awfully tiny; if there’s a Hoff
there, they are connected.

So today I spent some time trying to determine just how Godmother Anne Marie HOOFF was
connected to my great great great grandmother, Anna Marie HOFF BURKEY.
First, I tried to identify this new Anne Marie by finding her birth. I limited my search at CRHF to
Anne Maries born to a Hof/Hoof/Hooff/Hoff between 1700 and 1720. These dates would place
the godmother between 16 and 36. a reasonable age range for an unmarried woman to be
godmother. There were two possibles*: one was born to Jean Hoff and Catherine Beuret on 23-
Jan-1705. The other was born to Christian Hoff and Anne Marie Daner in 1712. From there, I
looked for the two women’s grandparents.

The Hoff/Kempf Anne Marie’s grandfather is Christian Hoff, b 25 Mar 1650, son of Jean Hoff and
Jacqueline Kempf.

The Hoff/ Daner Anne Marie’s grandfather is also Christian Hoff, b. 25-Mar-1650, son of Jean
Hoff and Jacqueline Kempf.

So the two Anne Maries are daughters of brothers, or first cousins.

I then identified all the male children the Hoff men produced, starting with Jean HOFF, born
about 1620. There were a lot, most of them named Jean. And I discovered that my Anne Marie’s
great great great grandfather, Christophe HOFF, born in 1654 to Jean HOFF and Jacqueline
KEMPF, had a brother, Christianus, born in 1650. And Christianus is grandfather to both
contenders for Godmother Anna Marie. Confused yet?

So Christianus, Godmother Anne Marie’s grandfather, is some sort of great-great-great-great
uncle to MY Anne Marie. I refuse to compute the exact relationship of the two Anne Maries.
But isn’t it amazing? These women, separated by 100 years, share not just ancestry, but a
BOURGEOIS connection, a really close one. People don't pick Godparents blithely; they are
close, trusted friends or family. It would appear that almost 300 years ago, the Hoffs and the
Bourgeois were important to one another. I realize no one’s probably very excited, but maybe
we should be. Did great grandmother BURKEY experience some subtle vibe with Frank
BUSHU, some recognition that they shared the unique experience of a tiny ville called Mertzen,
a close relationship in the mists of time, as in "Hmmm, there's something familiar about you . . .
Something, oh, je ne sais quoi . . ."

Okay, that's stretching it, but still . . . It’s pretty cool!


*There were two other Anne Maries born between 1700 and 1720, the likely period for a woman
to still be unmarried in 1736. One married in 1726; the other died at age two. Of course, it’s
possible Anne Marie was much older than 36 when she witnessed Joanny’s baptism. I’m not
exploring that. My brain is exhausted trying to keep all the Jeans, Michels, Christians, and Anne

Maries straight.

Friday, November 3, 2017

Hans Hertling and the Wayback Machine

Those of us who are related to the Wolf family of Mount Carmel know the value of Hans Hertling’s research. (So do lots of others, but I doubt they are reading this blog.) Some of us are fortunate enough to have his materials on Biblis US Immigrants (“Bibliser in Amerika"). I imagine I am not the only one to whom Hans gave a personalized ancestry of my Hertling relation, Eva Hertlling Wolf. Maybe some of you have a copy of his book, in which case this post won’t matter to you. (I have written Christel and offered to buy a copy; but whether she has one, whether she wants to go to the trouble of sending it, whether she's patient with my atrocious German, that’s all anyone’s guess. She’s pretty nice, so maybe I’ll get lucky, but meanwhile . . . . )  UPDATE: Cristel did send me a copy for which I am both grateful and intimidated. I KNEW it would be in German, but oh, wow! It shall take some time to translate. 

I’m at the point in my research where I want more information about the tangle of family, and the simple 5 page descendant chart I have from Emericus Hertling to Eva isn’t sufficient. Once upon a time, I could have done my research at Hans’ Internet domain at hertling-genealogie.de. Sadly, that site is gone. 

Enter www.archive.org/web, otherwise known as the Wayback Machine. Hans’ website was “captured” by the machine 67 times, most recently in 2017, but by then the site would have been defunct (Hans died in May of 2015). However, the March 3, 2007 capture is somewhat complete. There is a complete list of names; it's just that at some point the links from the name in the index to the family page don’t work. “Hertling” works; “Wolf” doesn’t. If you know which Hertling is your ancestor, you’re in good shape. For those who don’t, the site will be a challenge. But the data are there, and that’s a huge relief to me. I’m going to mine it for everything I can get. If you want to see what’s there, here’s the link: web.archive.org/20070329231433/http://www.hertling-genealogie.de. 

A couple of points to keep in mind. Because I found a lot of errors in the material on Francis Joseph Wolf’s descendants, I would be reluctant to trust Hans’ work here in the US as reported in March of 2007. I imagine that the issue is the fairly early date of this particular Wayback capture. I don’t know when Hans made his first trip to the US; if it was after 2007, those errors could be explained by his research limitations in Germany. I know he loved the Willard Library, spent a lot of time there and with Bill Wolf, and I suspect those errors were corrected at a later date. But captures made after 2007 are blank, so we have to live with what we have. 

One other point is worth making. Hans' research on Martin Wolf stops with him. I have been able to trace both Martin and his wife, Mary and Diemer, to their home towns in the Bas Rhin, Alsace. If you need those data, please let me know. I'll share.  

In the “for what it’s worth” department, a woman named Karen Harvey had an extensive genealogy site that included the Hertling ancestry (karenharvey.50megs.com, possibly a copy of Hans’ work. That site no longer works; the index of names is there, but the links are broken. Karen Harvey’s site is not archived. A search of the Wayback Machine says it has been excluded. 

I miss Hans pretty often; he became a good friend and collaborator, and his loss pains me. But I think he’d be pleased to know that his work lives on, even if it is in an obscure place like the Wayback Machine.


As an aside, this is an excellent demonstration of the need to do more than name your online source; taking a screenshot of the important data and saving it someplace safe is critical. 

Thursday, November 2, 2017

Duty: Herbert Augustin Bushu 1879-1957

It’s 1918 in Champaign IL and in the early morning light we see a tall, spare man, neatly dressed in jacket and tie, fedora placed just so upon his carefully trimmed sandy red hair, making his way down Springfield Avenue. He’s a few blocks from his destination, the railroad station where he is an agent for the Big Four Railroad. In my mind’s eye, I see him nod to passersby, a gracious but aloof man making his way to work. He’s had a light breakfast in his rooming house at 304 W. Springfield, perhaps exchanged pleasantries with his fellow boarders, and he will spend his day poring over account books, conferring with colleagues, literally making the trains run on time. His noon meal, taken at his desk or at a nearby diner, will be eaten quickly. He will not socialize with his fellow workers. At day’s end, he’ll redon his coat and hat and walk back to his rooming house, take his evening meal with landlady and lodgers, maybe spend a few hours in the parlor listening to news or a ballgame (his passion) before retiring to his solitary space for his nightly rituals. I see him record his day’s expenses in his neat hand in a ledger, send cordial regrets to his mother, explaining he cannot travel home for the weekend, write a fond note to his young daughter, enrolled at St. Theresa’s Catholic school in Decatur, or to his even younger son, staying with his parents in Mattoon, IL. His thoughts drift to issues in the office, to problems of supporting his distant children, and maybe to memories of his late wife. He shakes that off; regrets, anger, desire, grief, despair are not friends to him. 
He’s 39 years old, born on a farm, one of nine children, seven of whom live to adulthood. He has four brothers, at least one of whom gets to steal Herbert’s dream of farming. Early on, it must have been clear to him that he would not get the family farm; it was sold for $28,000 in 1902. Instead, he went to business college, graduated in 1899 and was hired by the Big Four Railroad. He would spend his entire working career in train offices. But when his son’s plans of pharmacy work didn’t pan out, Herbert installed him on a farm and focused his business sense on tracking expenses, making loans, monitoring the progress of the enterprise, and visiting often and happily. 
He was monumentally successful with the railroad, ultimately advancing to District Station Accountant in the Cincinnati office of the New York Central Railroad. When he retired in 1945, he declined a party, accepted his superior’s regrets in his retirement graciously, asked for his lifetime rail pass, and moved on with his life. 
His personal life seems to have been quiet and predictable. He traveled some with his daughter and son-in-law, visited the farm happily (the grandchildren there were his “little dears.”) Though he adored his daughter and deeply cared for his son-in-law, their kids were something else. Denny, Joyce, and Mary don’t remember much warmth from the man, perhaps because we violated his sense of dutiful behavior to his beloved daughter, our Mom. Susan was perfect, of course, and has loving memories of sitting with him listening to ball games. Debbie was five when he died; she has no memory of him. 
To the best of my knowledge, this handsome, fit, successful man never dated, never owned his own home, didn’t travel on his own. His address book lists relatives and colleagues, few friends. His one vice was a pipe, which ultimately gave him the cancer that killed him. Cheryl recalls a Packard that he gave her mom. Given where he lived when he was in Cincinnati, first in an apartment on Polaski, then on Clifton, and finally in his last years, on Glenway, a car would have been advantageous. But his was a lean life.
The few materials I have of his are bleak. We’re told that when his wife died, her sisters swept in and cleaned the place out. As a child I was horrified by this, but it may not have happened until his first transfer out of Mount Carmel to Champaign. Knowing his kids would not be with him, he’d have no need of things, so he kept nothing. Sadly, if he had photos, diaries, letters, or other memorabilia, they’re in the wind. My deepest regret is that I can't find a wedding picture of the couple; actually, we have no pictures at all of Ida and Herbert together. It may be that Ida's family rescued all sorts of memorabilia, but it's lost now. That thought saddens me more than I can express.
Is this who Ida married, this serious, quiet man? The few extant hints I see about her suggest she had some attitude, was persnickety (dressing her daughter in white and keeping her in her crib til daddy came home); pictures of her support this, but this could have been an artifact of her illness. My guess is that she was already ill with tuberculosis when she married in 1908, (her March 1915 obituary in the Mattoon paper says she was ill for five years!) though she may not have known it. So did Herbert marry a soul sister, someone with the same sense of doing the right thing, presenting a stalwart face to the world? Or for a few bright years, did he laugh, chase Ida around the kitchen table, toss children in the air, go on picnics and to dances? His brother Mel was a hell-raiser who married Ida’s sister Pauline (who seemed intent her entire life on being outrageous), usually successfully. I’d like to think that for a few years there was joy and play in Grandfather’s life.   
So that tall man walking down Springfield Avenue, toiling at his desk at the railroad, taking his evening meal with strangers: He will soldier on, as he’s done his whole life. He undresses, performs his nightly rituals, and climbs into bed; I hope to sleep. He will need his rest to meet the greyness, the duty, of the rest of his life. 
For nuts and bolts, read on

So the topic of today’s blog is Herbert Augustine Bushu, spouse of Ida Wolf, father of Herbert and Pauline Bushu, and grandfather to nine grandchildren. In anticipation of this blog, I sent out a call to my eight sisters and cousins, asking them to share what memories they may have. I heard back from five of the eight, which is an excellent response rate. It’s always possible someone else will chime in, but my experience is that if someone doesn’t respond pretty quickly, the request will get lost in the pile of emails. I spent today checking the variety of data I have about grandfather, and it’s time to write about the man while he’s fresh in my mind. So I’m going to go with what I have.
The problem I face is the reticence of both grandfather and his daughter. With the exception of Susan, the Rivers’ sisters found grandfather a silent, rather intimidating man. I cannot recall a single conversation with him, a moment in his lap, a story he might have told, a hug, a feeling of emotional attachment (though it should be kept in mind that I was 11 when he died). Denny and Joyce remember him similarly. I know Susan thought he was a very quiet man, thoughtful and shy; she recalled sitting with him on the porch at Ryland, listening to the ball games and counting the train cars as they chugged along the tracks. I remember the porch too, but I was a prickly, shy child, and if I sat with them, I haven’t a clue.
Cheryl remembers sitting on his lap at the zoo or watching trains come into the station. She also told me that she remembers him coming to their farm – the farm he loved so much – to die; she recalls him screaming in pain. Cassie, his nurse, asked Nancy and Cheryl to come into his room, and he called them “his little dears.” (I’m willing to bet he didn’t call Joyce, Denny or me little dears.)
We all know that mom adored him, that Dad (Daniel) had a lot of respect for him, enough that he was included in mom and dad’s trips to Temagami. When mom was deciding whether to join dad out west during the war, dad advised her to confer with her father. The fact that she packed up her three kids and maid and followed Dad west points to grandfather’s belief in mom’s strength and, perhaps, some reflection of his own decision, long ago, to send Ida to Colorado to heal while he stayed behind to work. 
This isn’t much, is it? But I’ve been thinking about this man for a while, and I think that the hallmark of his manhood is duty. For his entire life, grandfather did what he was supposed to, in a thoughtful, attention-avoidant, serious, purposeful manner. I think he may have sublimated what he wanted his entire life, first for his family, then for his wife, and finally for his children. I’ll try to explain how I came to that conclusion.
Herbert was born in Paris, IL, in 1879, the sixth child, third son of Francis J. Bushu and Agatha Burkey. His parents had moved to Paris because of a farm. Moran Bushu, Francis’ father, had moved to Paris to join his son James who had moved there some time earlier, and with his dad, bought a large farm that grew crops and raised pigs and cattle. Moran, our immigrant ancestor, had farmed in France, and the family had bought land in Somerset, Ohio about 15 minutes after they arrived there in 1827. Lester Bushue insists farming is in the Bushu blood, and while I don’t think it’s anywhere near mine, I am almost positive that Herbert would have been delirious had he been able to live his life growing crops. But it was not in the cards.
When Moran (Herbert’s grandfather) died, all his children quitclaimed their share of the farm to Herbert’s Uncle James. There’s some evidence that Herbert’s dad, Francis, shared ownership of the farm, which was focused on raising prize sheep and pigs, but it isn’t clear that he was an active participant in the business. And when James, who had no children, died, the farm must have been sold. Francis J.’s obituary says he moved to Il in 1872, and in 1891 moved to Mattoon where he engaged in farming until he sold the farm in 1901 (actually 1902 according to the newspaper). FJ and Agatha move into town and begin an active social life. Regardless, though Herbert may have wanted to farm, that didn't appear to be in the cards, so he instead went to business school, graduating in Dec 1899, and was hired by the Big Four in Mattoon as an office boy. He worked his entire life for the railroad, ultimately reaching District Station Accountant in Cincinnati, Ohio.
In 1901, Herbert was promoted to the Mt. Carmel office of the railroad “to a pleasant and easy position,” but by 1902 he’s back in Mattoon as stenographer in the Big Four Office. At some point, he must have been moved back to Mt. Carmel because the newspaper notes in 1905, and again in April 1906, that Herbert, of Mt. Carmel, is home visiting for a few days. Somewhere along the line while in Mt. Carmel, perhaps in church, Herbert meets the lovely Ida, and love blooms. From here on, newspaper mentions are simple, indicating he’s home visiting family for a few days. The only newspaper mention of Herbert and Ida’s wedding is the social note that Melvin traveled to Mt. Carmel to attend his brother’s wedding. The newspaper doesn’t indicate if his parents attended. [Thus far, Mount Carmel newspapers are not available online; I hope to get back to Mount Carmel again, but until then, we must live with my limited information.]
This essay isn’t about Herbert’s siblings, but I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention that the newspapers from 1898-1909 are FULL of the antics of Myrtle, Ellen Etta, and Melvin; there are lots of references – more staid – to Sam, Claudimar, and Otho. Of course, these people are in Mattoon, while Herbert is in Mt. Carmel. But the lack of a wedding announcement is puzzling, and there’s no mention of his parents or siblings other than Mel attending the marriage. I don’t think Herbert had a big footprint in Mattoon.
In Oct. 1908, Ida and Herbert marry, and in September 1909, Pauline is born, followed in Dec 1910 by Herbert C. Herbert and Ida had an apartment close to the railroad. As far as I can tell, for most of his working life, grandfather lived within walking distance of his job, residing in rooming houses and hotels. Nancy told me he had a Packard at one point that he gave to her mom; presumably this was a purchase made when he was living in Cincinnati, far from the office in Union Station. But in all other towns, he lived but a few blocks from his job. 
It's important to remember that Henry Wolf, Ida’s brother, died in 1907 of TB; he was the first to succumb to the disease, and Ida was still living at home at the time of his death. I imagine she was harboring the disease when she married, and perhaps bearing children exacerbated the illness. By 1912, Ida and Elizabeth were in Colorado while Ida “took the cure;” she's there until early 1914. We know that her husband stayed behind, presumably because he had to pay some substantial bills; there are newspaper mentions of him traveling with Eva and his baby daughter to Colorado. 
[I've mentioned this elsewhere but it bears repeating: Bill Wolf told me that the reason Pauline and her brother didn't inherit anything when Frank J. Wolf died is because he paid for Ida's time in Colorado. This isn't true; Grandfather had a small debt to his father-in-law that was paid when Frank died. I think the bulk of Ida's care was paid for by her husband who lived a lean life in order to care for her.] 
So let me pause here. It's 1912 and the  man has two kids, his in-law’s home is an incubator for TB, his own family is a hundred miles of crazy road away, he’s got a responsible job, and somehow he has to hold it all together while his wife tries to get well. Ida chose her husband well; she got herself a guy who knew what he had to do and did it. It isn’t clear how much help he got. His father-in-law kept track of Herbert’s debts but they weren’t much, and he paid off when Frank Wolf died in 1927. 
After Ida died, I assume the children went to St. Mary’s school in Mt. Carmel until Herbert was transferred out of the area, first to Danville, IL, at which point, Pauline, at least, was sent to a boarding school in Decatur, IL. While she was there, her point of contact was the Bushu family, not the Wolfs, understandable since TB continued to haunt the house in Mt. Carmel. Early on, when grandfather is in Danville, his young son, living with Frank and Agatha in Mattoon, contracts Typhoid fever; the newspaper mentions Herbert comes home to see his child. At some later point, Herbert C. was sent to a military school. The cost for this sort of care must have been extraordinary, which goes a long way to explaining the austerity in which grandfather lived. And so we see Herbert moving to Danville (I think), then Champaign (1918), then Indianapolis, and finally Cincinnati where he first lives at the Fountain Square Hotel. (I know he’s in Indianapolis in 1922-1926; He’s the station supervisor, according to the city directory, but I don’t know when he arrived, or when he left. The Mattoon papers only mention him when he comes for a visit.) 
Once ensconced in Cincinnati, he traveled on occasion with his daughter, had Sunday dinner with us, presumably visited the farm as often as possible. When he retired in 1945, he refused any sort of send-off, simply reminding his boss he’d like his unlimited travel pass, please. He was part owner of the cottage in Ryland, and Susan said that, while Mom and Dad were there during school summer break, grandfather went down early, stayed late. 
He stayed with the railroad as it evolved into the New York Central. But he doesn’t seem to have given up his dream of farming. When his son, Herbert, abandoned a pharmacy career, he installed him on a farm. Grandfather paid close attention to the farm’s business. I have a notebook in which grandfather kept the farm account, tallying seed cost, sale proceeds, repairs, etc. to the penny. It must have been hell for his son. I don’t think Uncle Herb’s heart was in the enterprise; the farm was sold soon after grandfather died, and the family moved to Springfield, Ohio where Herb opened a bar.  
He didn’t deserve the death he got. Several family members remember his last days when he was first in the hospital, then a psych ward, as pain made him crazy, and he hallucinated. Ultimately, he was taken by ambulance to his son’s farm; Cheryl remembers him screaming in pain in his last days. He died on the farm and was buried in Mt. Carmel next to Ida. Mom replaced Ida’s headstone with one matching her father’s, and Susan remembers the wake, involving Wolfs and Bushus, as unseemly; I think there was more giddiness than seemed appropriate.  
He left an enormous estate for the time, the lion’s share of which mom got due to her brother’s chronic indebtedness. Or at least on paper she got it; given it was mom, I can imagine her being generous to her brother. But then again, her husband died two months after her father, and she may have been sleepwalking through the estate settlement. I’ve decided I don’t want to know what happened. 
I still don’t know who this man was, but I’m sure he and boarding school and Catholic nuns made mother who she was. He modeled how to endure the loss of a beloved spouse. He exemplified the importance of doing the right thing. He personified stoicism and conveyed a message of not complaining, of shouldering one’s duty. And of course, she passed some, perhaps much, of that on to her children. Oh, the unintentional legacies we pass to our children. 


*The farm stuff is confusing. In 1902 Agatha et al sold property to J. H. Taylor for $28,000; I’m assuming this is the farm. In August of 1905, J. H. Taylor sold “The Bushu farm” for $42,000. And then Dec 1908, F. J. Bushu bought the Rev. CB Taylor farm for $26,000. But FJ and Agatha stayed on in town. I have a photo from the Internet labeled Claude Bushu on the farm; my wild guess is that Claude got, or at least managed, the farm that FJ bought from Taylor. But I really don’t know. 

Friday, February 10, 2017

The mysterious Aunt Betts (Elizabeth Wolf Fitzpatrick)

Elizabeth Wolf (Aunt Betts) is a bit of a legend among Pauline Rivers' daughters. Mom told quite few stories about her aunt, and we loved them. Beautiful, willful, a feminist before feminism was a term, a self-made millionaire. Though we didn't really know her well -- other than Joyce who lived in California for a time and visited with Betts -- we knew the stories and thought we knew the woman.

What you're about to read is deviation from my usual approach. Generally I take the data I have found about someone, embed it in the culture of the area and the times and build a speculative narrative.  But in Betts's case, I have real conflicts between the myth Betts crafted and the facts. That's a disappointment because I think she probably had a remarkable life; just not the one we were told she had. And it's too late for me to really put it all together. What I have is a good deal of evidence that what she supposedly did wasn't what she actually did. But I don't know why she lied, and some key pieces that would reveal the woman she was are missing, probably never to be found.

The Aunt Betts myth is this. As a young woman, she became furious with her father for leaving his vast holdings to his two living sons, leaving nothing to his daughters on the premise they could marry money. In a huff, Betts left her family and went off in search of her fortune. She found it in California, where she either worked for a stockbroker who taught her how to invest, married a stockbroker who taught her how to invest, or became a stockbroker on the Pacific Exchange. Because of her father, she made certain in her will that only women would inherit her estate. We heard that she never returned to her hometown, Mt. Carmel, Illinois. Of her husband, Dennis Fitzpatrick, we knew almost nothing. End of story. However, keep in mind that this story of a strong, independent woman had quite an impact on those young women who heard it. I, for one, was rather in awe of this tough bird. When I finally met her in 1974, she was elderly, lucid, charming, sophisticated, and generous.

The trouble with the myth is that, other than the business of the will, as far as I can determine, none of it fits the facts. I've spent a lot of time off and on tracking down (or actually NOT tracking down) Betts and I'm feeling a bit bereft. An icon has cracked and just might be turning to dust.


I'm going to preface this with an important caveat. While Mt. Carmel had a variety of newspapers that were thriving in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, there don't appear to be many editions in archives, real or digital. So while I can trace the Bushu activities in Mattoon papers (their comings and goings are breathlessly reported and sometimes various Wolfs were included, including Betts for a brief period in 1914-1915), I've yet to find more than a scattering of Mt. Carmel papers, and the Wolfs are not in them. No birth, wedding, or death announcements, no soirees, no travel news, no business brags, no sales, no lawsuits, no scandals. I have a few obituaries, and that's it. It's a massive shame, not just because we've lost all the fascinating social history of our family, but because the vibrancy of journalism of that period was and is worth preserving, and it wasn't.

Back to our story.

Elizabeth was born Jan 20, 1883 to Francis J. Wolf and Eva Hertling Wolf in Mt. Carmel, IL. She was the fourth child and fourth daughter, and my guess is that her dad wasn't exactly thrilled to have yet another girl.  Eva had been producing girl children on a regular basis, starting with Mary in 1876, Til in 1878, and Ida in 1880. Men of that era, especially men who were making something of themselves, as Frank was, wanted sons. In 1885, Eva would finally present Frank with son Henry, and I'm willing to bet that Henry became the center of his father's world. The 1883 baby girl was christened simply Elizabeth — no middle name, an anomaly for the time — on 21 February, 1883 at St. Mary's Catholic Church. Her godparents were Johannes and Elizabeth Schmitt.

An early census tells us that Betts completed the sixth grade (a later one changes that to third year of high school). She probably attended St. Mary's Catholic elementary school (St. Mary's has no records for that period); I don't know where she would have gone to high school, if in fact she did. She appears with her family in the 1900 census (as Lizzie, age 17) and In 1908, at 25, she was one of the witnesses to Ida and Herbert's wedding. But in 1910, when she would have been 27, I can’t find her ANYWHERE. I’ve done the standard searches in the census, and I’ve gone through all the pages of the three Mt. Carmel districts’ censuses, and she isn’t in any of them. Frank G., Pauline, and Ray are with Frank and Eva but there's no mention of Elizabeth. My best guess is that she’s staying with one of her sisters, possibly Ida, who has a new baby, or Mary, who dies at the end of the year of TB, but she doesn't appear with them in the census. Maybe she's bouncing between her sisters and her parents and so is simply missed in the census. In 1914, when she visits her sister Pauline in Mattoon, the newspaper reports her as "of Mt. Carmel." The newspapers were pretty careful to specify where someone made her home, so in the absence of evidence, I'm applying Occam's razor and going with the easiest answer: She's in Mt. Carmel.

(In the interest of making sure what I know doesn't get lost, I shall wander off topic for a second. Francis Joseph Wolf was quite possibly an ambitious lad, one who broke with his Indiana family soon after marriage. The family farmed, and that doesn't seem to have appealed to him. More tellingly though, in my mind, is that his break may not have been cordial.  Only Rosa carries a name that echoes his family. Frank's father was Martin, his grandfather Peter; those names do not appear in his children. I don't know if that means he simply rejected the old world naming conventions, if it was Eva's influence, or if there were more than miles between him and his family.  I mention this because an easy place for an unmarried woman to go would be to her father or mother's family. And I really doubt that's where Elizabeth was in 1910, not only because I think Betts was too ambitious to submit to an agrarian lifestyle, but because I don't think Frank's relations with his family were that cordial. But I'm absolutely speculating here.)

And I did look briefly into the possibility she was with her Hertling relations. That is, of course, possible, but I haven't seen any evidence that the Wolf family was tight with Eva's relatives. Her brother Philip moved to Mt. Carmel in 1900 and I think he and his wife MIGHT have been the unidentified couple in a late photo of Frank and Eva. I will investigate that possibility if I ever run out of other stuff to look up. Right now, I've decided Elizabeth's whereabouts in 1910 aren't that central.)

In 1911 or so, Betts moved to Colorado Springs with her sister Ida Wolf Bushu, who relocated there, sometime between June and Nov of 1911, in hopes of defeating tuberculosis. I know Betts was there; she's listed in the 1912 city directory. But I don't know for how long. She and Ida are not listed in the 1913 directory. Ida died of TB in March of 1915, in Mt. Carmel, and Ida's obituary names Elizabeth as one of her sisters living in Mt. Carmel. I’m going to guess that Betts stayed with Ida during her illness after they returned to Mt. Carmel, but I have no evidence of that (you will get tired of me saying that). It would appear that Betts and Ida were close; Ida's death must have hit Betts very hard.

On August 28, 1914, Elizabeth Wolf accompanied her sister Pauline Bushu back to Mattoon. The newspaper doesn't indicate how long she stayed. And two months after Ida's death, from May 14 to at least June 25, Elizabeth spends time in Mattoon with Pauline. I searched the Mattoon newspapers for more mentions of Elizabeth and came up blank.

Betts next appears, perhaps, in the 1920 census in Salt Lake City, working as a shopgirl. I have a photo of her taken in some western location, so it's certainly plausible to think this is she. This Elizabeth Wolf is the only one in the entire US 1920 census who is a reasonable match. The census data are accurate (her birthplace and her parents’ birthplaces) except for her age; the census says this 37 year old woman was 29. We know that census data are often inaccurate so perhaps this is Betts. In 1920, her parents are living in San Diego, for what earthly reason I haven't a clue. Just in case Frank and Eva had gone to San Diego to be near Betts — for whatever reason — I checked the San Diego City Directories from 1919-1921 and found her none of them.

Around 1926, when she was 43, but before April 1927, Betts married Dennis Fitzpatrick, an car service agent for the railroad in San Francisco. And before you ask, I don't know where they met, where she was living when they met, or where and when they married. I do know Dennis was born in Cincinnati August 12, 1868, married Maggie Crowley at 19, and with her produced at least three children (Hattie, Kathleen, and Edward John). I presume he was a widower when he met Betts. Mother told me once that she didn't like Dennis; he'd once made a pass at her. I have no idea how she might have known him; in 1926, Mom was 17. Perhaps she met him at Frank J's funeral in 1927; the obituary makes no mention of Dennis being present (or for that matter, mother, her brother, and her father) but it's reasonable to expect him (and the others) to have been there to pay their last respects. Or perhaps mother met him in Cincinnati. Another puzzle piece that is just floating around the periphery of Betts' life.

In 1927, Frank J. Wolf died, and Betts is named in his obituary as attending the funeral. Frank had turned over his businesses to his two sons prior to his death, so his daughters did not share in that wealth. However, Frank did leave property to his surviving daughters (and his grandchildren), and Elizabeth got a building in Mt. Carmel.

Frank Wolf was a self-made man; he started a soft drink company in 1886 (Wolf Soda) in Mt. Carmel, Illinois that ultimately became a bottler for Coca-Cola (1905-1975). He invested his profits in land and oil leases, and when he died, he left behind a lot of property and successful businesses. His pride in his success is evident in the photos we have the era, formal portraits of his daughters (he would have two more girls after Elizabeth, Rosa and Pauline, and two more sons) posing in fancy settings and dressed in gorgeous gowns and hats. In fact, we have a wonderful photo of prosperous-looking Frank, decorous Eva, and six children, probably taken in 1888 or so. As the family grew, and Frank prospered, they moved into grander houses; Frank must have felt he was living the American dream. Apparently he invested in Mt. Carmel property and that's what he left to his remaining daughters, but the bulk of his wealth went to the boys, and Betts, according to the family myth, was not pleased.

Presumably after her father's funeral, Betts returned to California. She and Dennis are in the 1930 census; he's an invalid. Dennis died Oct. 30, 1930 at 62. He's buried in Holy Cross Cemetery, Colma, California. They'd been married no more than four years.

At some point after Dennis' death, per Bill Wolf (son of Frank G. Wolf, Betts' brother), Betts returned to Mt. Carmel to care for her mother. Bill said she came home frequently, and that Frank G. paid for those trips. In 1937, Eva died and shortly thereafter, Betts took two ocean voyages: one to Vera Cruz and one to Ireland. Dennis' parents were from Ireland; perhaps she was seeking his roots or visiting his family? I don’t know; I never heard of these trips. Bill thought she stuck around Mt. Carmel for a while after Eva's death, but he isn't sure of the details. Ultimately, she returned to California. In the 1930 census, she's unemployed, and in 1940, she's a clerical worker in a real estate office

Betts appears to have worked in shops and real estate offices and lived in apartments in San Francisco through the 40s, 50s and early 60s. After that she moved into a retirement center run by nuns in San Rafael, California. In the late 1970s Pauline Rivers and Marietta Suer visited Aunt Betts in San Rafael. By this time, Pauline was mildly impaired with Alzheimer’s, and Marietta, who had had a tough life and was a strange woman herself, was helping Pauline with her ADLs. Something happened on this trip, but no one now alive knows what. Whatever it was, it drove Betts to modify her will and disinherit everyone except the convent caring for her and Marietta.  She died in 1982, age 99. Her death set off a small war among her female descendants. In her original will, Betts had left half of her estate to the convent where she lived and the other half to her living female relatives. But shortly before her death, she wrote five codicils in which she changed her heirs to just the convent and Marietta Bushu Suer. Many of the women who were disinherited sued, and after all was said and done, the convent got its half undiminished, the lawyers took half of the remaining estate and a bundle of heirs divided the rest.

So who the hell was this woman? Family lore suggests she put Mt. Carmel in her rearview mirror and never looked back; facts say she came home to be the dutiful sister and daughter, and in fact, returned multiple times at her relatives' expense. She married late to an invalid 15 years older. If Betts worked for, was married to, or became a stockbroker, (Tom Gutman, Joyce Rivers' ex-husband, claims she was the first woman stockbroker on the Pacific Exchange), there are no data to back that up. But she left a substantial estate. Was it Dennis's? I have doubts. If Dennis Fitzpatrick had money, we have to assume his children would have been his heirs. And given the apartment he and Betts were in in 1930, I don't think he was wealthy. Where did the money come from?

And more importantly,  much more importantly, who was Elizabeth Wolf? Clearly she had a very complicated relationship with her family; Bill Wolf gave me a wonderful photo of her with Bill and his wife Wanda, his mom and dad, and a hunting guide, all of them displaying dead geese, taken maybe in the 60s.  He says she hung around Mt. Carmel for a while after Eva died. I think I can understand that. She wandered about the country working wage jobs, married an invalid much older than she who died within a few years, plunged from being his nurse to caring for her mom, and then burying her. No wonder she took off for Mexico and Ireland.

And all we have of her are a few photos, a big box of documents pertaining to the will and its challenge, and the stories in my head. No one knows where the rainbow of her life is; her photos, journals, memorabilia, old clothes, books, address books, calendars, bills, furniture, collectibles. I think the heirs who fought so hard for her money fought only for her money; no one I've asked knows where her "life" went.

I don't have any answers. I want to believe she fell in love with Dennis, and they had three fabulous years together. But I also wonder at times if she were gay and married Dennis as her beard. Or she was tired of knocking around menial jobs and wanted someone to take care of her.  Or perhaps she had a wealthy lover -- male or female -- that she couldn't acknowledge. Maybe she embezzled, robbed a bank, found a sackful of 100s on the bus, or ran a brothel. But the puzzle arises not from the tale of the money but from the rift between myth and reality.

The point to genealogy is to answer questions, fill in blanks, get a sense of who you are, where you came from, what shaped you. I'm finding it a bit unsettling to discover that someone who was held up to me as a model is so elusive, so complicated, and ... so human. And then to discover that those who would seem to be nothing special (Yes, I'm looking at you, Mame Wolf Walters Miller) turn out to dazzle. Genealogy: the science of confusing the dead, irritating the living, and upending everything you believe.


Sunday, October 23, 2016

Jaak Panksepp and genealogy

You know the feeling: You finally, FINALLY, nail down that elusive 17th century ancestor. You've got her cold: name, parents, dates, place, and your data match marriage documents, baptismal records, censuses, cemetery photos. Yes! But wait, you have to RECORD all this, cite your sources, make sure your translation is correct, make sure it's all recorded carefully and fully for the next person. And all the while you're chomping at the bit to grab that next hint -- the godparents' names, the witnesses -- and chase the next, earlier ancestor. Waaah! I don't wanna!!! Waaah!

Sound familiar? So why do we struggle to do our due diligence? Because the thrill is in the hunt, not the kill, that's why.

Welcome to the science of Jaak Panksepp. Before I go on, I shall warn you I am going to butcher Jaak in this summary. Google him, read his research; he's a serious neuroscientist. But first let me tell you how he relates to what follows,

In a nutshell, Panksepp says that humans (and the animals and lizards that came before) are driven to hunt because they are rewarded, via the release of happy-making endorphins, for the HUNT. It's not the kill that satisfies; it's the stalking, the creeping, the sudden pounce, the aha (well, he doesn't say that; he just talks about the reward of seeking). He argues that's the impetus behind my dog who will kill a squirrel and leave it on the deck (because she just ate and isn't hungry, but Oh it's so much fun to chase and catch). I argue that it's the impetus behind shopping. If you are someone who loves to shop but often finds himself staring at something just purchased and then sticking it in a drawer, you know what I mean. The hunt was fabulous; the get? not so much.

So, genealogy. I'm not a shopper of stuff, but I LOVE shopping for ancestors. And, like my squirrel-displaying dog, I like to show off my catches. We all do. We find new and wonderful ways to display the long reach of our ancestry, back 8, 10, 15 generations. And then we show it to our siblings, tape it to walls at reunions, and wait for others to ooh and ahh. And they don't.

Why? Well, perhaps because they didn't experience the high of the seek and what they are looking at is terrifically boring.  Imagine for a moment your second cousin once removed who loves to fish. And he brings to the reunion not just a photo of his August 17, 2013 catch of an 8-pound bass in Lake Whosybutt but a terrific, not-to-be-believed graphic of his catches from 1988, with species, dates, sizes, locations, and bait. That's us, genie friends. Our 20' x 6' banners that stretch to the 15th century with names, dates, places. We tack them up and wonder why they fetch no more than a glance: well, think fish.

So what do those of us who've gone to unbelievable lengths to track down our 16th century relatives do?  Here's one idea. We know a lot, right? And then there's the Internet, Wikipedia, Google Earth. So pick three or four really early ancestors and make a brief graphic, with pictures of places and information about that social world in which they lived. Put them on a poster. Or a two-page handout. You can pick the earliest ones, the ones you have the most information about, the one that is maybe famous or infamous, or the one who breaks your heart.

The stories I like are about the earliest Bourgeois, Jean, who's born in Montfaucon, Switzerland in 1694 and gets married in Mertzen Alsace France just 15 km away but over the Jura Mountains, which are serious mountains.  I have photos of Montfaucon, its church, and a lovely image of his baptismal record. Or about the Bourgeois relative who fought with Napolean and was awarded the Medale Ste Helene. Or maybe the young 18th century woman who bore a child out of wedlock, an infant girl who died the next day, followed seven years later by her mom, still unmarried, still living with her uncle. Or the brothers who were French one day and conscripted by Hitler the next, only to die on the Russian front.

When I recently visited a sister with both stories and a lovely 12 generation chart, it was the stories that got her attention. Oddly, our relatives just assume we've done it right; they don't really necessarily want to see the tidy progression through the centuries. But if you can briefly introduce them to the truly bad German Chancellor who just happens to be a relative, or to the tragedy of the orphaned baby who marries at 17, has eleven children, and dies at 44, you will hold their attention.





Sunday, September 11, 2016

Is Anne Marie Moritz of Friesen Meinrad's wife? Maybe

On Sept 9, 2016, I got an email from a man I've corresponded with via my blog, Bryan Bushue. He is seeking Mary Bushue, the first wife of Meinrad Bushue (Bourgeois) and mother of Jonas Bushue, Bryan's ancestor. He knew from my blog that entries from The Barqilla de la Santa Maria suggest her name was something like Mourite or Moretz, but that I have nothing more: no immigration record, no marriage record, no record of Jonas' birth.  The email was a bombshell; he'd found an Anne Marie Moritz born in Friesen in 1811 to Joseph Moritz and Reine Phillippe. He thought it was a long shot that she was his ancestor, but I disagree. I think he may have found his great-great-great grandmother.  

I can never resist an excuse to rummage in the French archives, so that's what I did, late into the night and the following morning.  I logged into my favorite sites and uncovered a lot of information.  Unfortunately, I found nothing that confirms that Anne Marie is Meinrad's first wife, but I think we have enough evidence that it's a strong possibility.

According to her headstone, Mary Ann, consort of Meinrad Burshow, died 21 August 1845. She was 34 years, 4 months, and 10 days old, which places her birth on11 April 1811, according to a website that does that sort of backward calculation. 

The woman Bryan identified, Anne Marie Moritz, was born 1 April 1811 to Joseph Moritz, 49, mayor of Friesen, and Reine (or Regine) Phillippe, 24. Reine was Joseph's second wife. They married 17 July 1808 after the death of Joseph's first wife, Anne Marie Stein, who died in mid-1807. In addition to Anne Marie, they had a son, Jean, born 1 Jan 1809, (which suggests that Joseph's father's name was Jean), and on 28 June, 1813, they had a second daughter, Anne. On 1 March, 1814, Joseph died, leaving his young wife with three children under 6. Reine (Regina in record) remarried, to Jean Hellbruner, on 19 March 1816. 

There are quite a few Moritz's in Friesen and sorting them out, as always, was a chore. But I read all the original indexes (the civil officials in Friesen almost always created a  handwritten index to their records, created at the end of each year, which makes life lots easier for the researcher) for the births, marriages, and deaths in Friesen (marriages to 1847, deaths to 1840) and found no evidence that Anne Marie married or died in those time periods. So we have a woman born at the right time who then disappeared from the French record. Perhaps she reappeared on the other side of the Atlantic? 

So is she Jonas Bushue's mom?  I have no solid evidence that she is, but some good reasons to believe she could be.

  1. Friesen is 5 km. from Mertzen, the Bourgeois home. The Bourgeois men and women often married men and women from surrounding communities, so it's easy to see the families being acquainted.
  2. This is especially true since both Joseph Moritz and several of the Bourgeois men were civic officials. So it isn't just that they would have known one another; the families would have been peers.
  3. In addition, various witnesses in the Moritz marriage and birth documents include the Flurys, a family that has strong relationships within the Bourgeois family. And various Moritzs marry into families that appear in the Bourgeois records. I didn't check all the names but I think that would be valuable. 
  4. Then there's what's missing: a marriage. As the daughter of a prominent man, Anne Marie would have been a hot prospect, and I can't find a marriage record. Just to be sure, I checked for a marriage in Largitzen as well, a town often paired with Friesen. Nothing. If she married, it wasn't in the area around her home, and that would be very unusual.
  5. And while nobody should put too much weight on dates, there's the eerie confluence of the information on Mary Ann Burshow's headstone that says she was 34 years, 4 months, and 10 days old when she died 21 Aug 1845. April 11, 1811 is damn close to 1 Apr 1811. 
  6. I should note that the transposition of her name when anglicized, from Anne Marie to Mary Ann, bothers me not a whit. My assumption is that she was known as Marie (after all she has a younger sister Anne). 


If Mary Ann IS Anne Marie, when and how did she get here? In 1827 she was 16, unlikely to travel alone, so who was she with? I checked the 1830 census in Perry County for Hellbruner (and variations), the name of Anne Marie’s stepfather; nothing even close. Jonas was born in Sept of 1829 so, assuming no gun-jumping, Meinrad and Mary Ann married around the end of 1828, meaning Mary Ann was here by then. Of course, we don't know when Meinrad arrived so it's still possible that they traveled together. The CRHF has no record of an Anne Marie Moritz emigration. 

The Bourgeois family is listed, with lots of creative names and ages, on a compilation of passenger lists from ships entering Baltimore between April 1, 1827 and Sept 30, 1827. I read the entire list; no Moritz (or anything close) to be found. The Bourgeois register of names lists, in addition to the parents, three young males and two females. The assumption is that Meinrad is the missing male but that's not certain; it could be Michael. One of the females could be Anne Marie Moritz, but then one of the family's young daughters is missing, not unheard of but . . . the immigration record is too messy to help. (See “The Bourgeois Immigration Tangle” for more than you could possibly want to know.)

Passenger records weren't mandatory in 1827 so it's possible that IF Anne Marie emigrated to the US, we won't find a record. And finding that an Anne Marie Moritz emigrated from France to the US in 1827 is not proof she is Meinrad's wife (though it would certainly increase the probability). But I think it would be worthwhile to obtain the original emigration record for Meinrad and family listed at CRHF; perhaps there are details about just who was traveling.

I'd also write Friesen for information. A prominent genealogist, whose name I don't recall, suggests writing to these small communities and asking for the name of the person who is the "town's memory." Every town has such a person, someone who listened to the old stories and remembers them. So I'd write Friesen, ask if they have official information about emigrations, and ask for the name of the story keeper. 

And I would also spread a wider net in the search for Meinrad and Mary Ann's marriage. Somerset and its environs were served by itinerant priests in the 1820s and their records can end up in odd places: I found Johannes Muller and Anna Hierholzer's marriage record in Chilicothe, Ohio. Of course, those old records don't always provide more than the names of those who are marrying, but one can hope.

One final note: Gerard Marck has his ancestry posted at geneanet.org. I've seen his trees before (we share ancestors), and he's pretty reliable. He has Joseph Moritz's ancestry back three generations, to the mid 1600s. Interestingly, he has both of Joseph's marriages but he has only one of his children by Reine Phillip: Jean.


In the process of sorting out names, I looked at a lot of records. Here are a few of the Moritz records checked. These records helped me eliminate possible Anne Maries and Josephs.

  1. Jean Moritz, Joseph's older brother, married Marguerite Kohler (another Mertzen name associated with the Bourgeois). They had Marie Margarite in 1806 and Anne Marie 18 July 1813. 
  2. Anne Marie Moritz, 33, died 4 May 1821,
  3. Anne Moritz, 68, died in 1840
  4. Anne Marie Moritz, 27, married Jean Frettig 20 Apr 1841
  5. Anne Marie Moritz, 22, m. Jean Colombe 13 Jan 1841.
  6. Anne Marie Moritz m. Pierre Pflager 21 Apr 1847. Page is missing in Haut Rhin records. But in 1847, Anne Marie would have been 36, pretty old for a first marriage (though not impossible). I checked the surrounding pages; it wasn’t out of order, the page was missed during scanning.
  7. Joseph Moritz, 24, died 5 Feb 1819.
  8. Joseph Moritz, 3, died 11 Jan, 1820. 



Tuesday, August 23, 2016

The mystery of Meinrad Bushue's wife Mary

Who was Myrod Bushue's first wife?

It would appear from some of the comments on this blog that there are a few folks out there who would like more information about Mary Ann Bushue, first wife of Myrod (Meinrad in French records) Bourgeois 1803. When Lester Bushue (Myrod and Mary are his direct ancestors) did his research on the family, he was unable to learn anything more about Mary, so recently he asked me to see what I could learn. While people may want to do their own searches, for those who may not want to go over old ground, here is a summary of what I did and learned.

My searches

I searched the records indexed in The Barquilla  for St. Joseph and Holy Trinity churches and found no record of a marriage between Myrod and Mary nor the baptism of their only son Jonas, born ~1829.

However, Mary's birth name is in 2 baptisms for which she is a sponsor:

     24 Mar 1834 Mary Anna of Wendelin Tol (?) and Mary Anna Stuter; sponsors, Mynrad Boujour and Mary Mourite.

     5 Jan 1840 Conditionally John Henry, son of M. Burcheau and Mary A. Miller. Spons Minerad Burcheau and Mary Burcheau (nee Moretz).

So we have a name. The variety of spellings I've seen that resemble Moretz/Mourite suggests to me that Mary Ann was either an immigrant herself or that her parents were. I also surmise she was German-speaking, simply because German-speaking immigrant marrying German-speaking immigrant is far more likely than anything else. But obviously, the unlikely is always possible. I just didn't pursue that line of inquiry; instead I limited myself to finding a recent immigrant.

Tim Fisher's Perry County site does not have a marriage for Myrod and Mary Ann, nor Jonas' birth. It does list two Morrises, George and Jessee, but no Moritz, Moretz, etc. Mary Ann could be a sister or daughter of one of them, but I doubt it. I don't see too many priests or officials mispelling Morris as Moretz; the reverse is more llikely.

Because the Bourgeois family's immigration record is confusing (see my Bourgeois immigration post for more details), I considered that Myrod may have married Mary in France. So I checked the Mertzen and Strueth marriages from 1824-1827. (It would be highly unlikely that Myrod would have married any younger than 18 and the family was gone by mid 1827.) No marriage.

I also considered that Mary Ann may have been from one of the little communities surrounding Mertzen and Strueth and that she emigrated with her own family. In this scenario, she could have known Myrod before he left or met him in Somerset. This search was more complex.

In the hours and hours I've spent ruining my eyesight reading the French records of Mertzen and Strueth, I've never seen a name similar to Moretz. So I tackled the question from two other angles. First, I checked for the name, using lots of wildcard characters, at the CRHF, a private, non-profit French (mainly Haut Rhin) record depository. Nothing.

Then I checked at geneanet.net, a site that hosts lots of French family trees. I limited the search to the area 20 km around Strueth. Again, using lots of spellings and wildcards, nothing came up.

I have not done an exhaustive search of immigration records. Too many possible arrival dates, name spellings, ports.

My final effort was to write a genealogist, Sue Saylor, who works at the Perry County chapter of the Ohio Genealogical Society. Her report follows.

From Sue Saylor, reseacher, Perry County genie society
July 12, 2016

Well, I tried.......... but I'm afraid I couldn't find any definite answers to what Mary's maiden name might have been.  I checked as many sources that I have available to me for Moreitz, Morris, & Mautz, etc.
Some of the things I checked are:
Ohio Marriages Jan. 1, 1821 - 31 Dec. 1830
Fairfield Co. early marriages
Index to Wills and Estates of Fairfield Co. 1803-1900 (There was an Alvah S. Bushee, but no Morris / Mautz, Moreitz that matched)
Perry County Wills and other court cases
Family Histories and our genealogy collection in general

In 2003 our Chapter published the Pioneers of Perry County by 1830 with the 1820 census. I did not find any biographies pertaining to your families or the Morris, etc. Nor did the census for this county list any Morris. (Of course this was one person's interpretation of our census for 1820.)
Some other surnames that appear in her abstraction of the Reading Twp. area are:
Moirs, John
Montz, Jacob and John
Muntz, Jacob
Means, George, Jacob and Patrick
Moultz, Leonard
Meek, Frederick, George and John

I found two early Wills in our Probate. One for Huldah Morris in 1852 and Conrad Mautz in 1847. I found Huldah's Will on familysearch, but it didn't mention family other than her husband, Jesse? If you want to view the Conrad Mautz Will, go to familysearch--Ohio --Probate Records - Wills for the time appropriate time. Unfortunately, these Wills are not indexed, and the page numbering isn't ideal, but it's doable. Just look for his name in the index.
The first 3500 (actual) Probate cases here have been moved to the archives, and it almost takes an act of Congress to get someone to make copies or even get access. :-(

Sorry, I couldn't help this time. If anything else comes to mind, I'd be happy to check it out if possible.
Thanks
Sue

My own musings at this point

I don't think her name was Morris. The two spellings we have of her name suggest it was one that made scribes guess about the spelling (maybe because a German accent was involved). Names from The Barq that seem reasonable include Moretz, Moritz, Mautz, Mourite, and Moutz.

Saylor didn't look at land records, but I don't see how those would help unless there's a land sale in which Mary gives up her dower rights.

Where to go from here
If I were asked, I'd suggest that her descendants keep searching Ancestry and FamilySearch; as more records get indexed and added online, her marriage or the birth of her son may appear. Those records could have been recorded far from Somerset; I found Johannes Muller-Anna Hierholzer's marriage in Chillicothe, Ohio. They weren't married there; it's just where the itinerant priest's records ended up.

The US didn't require passenger records until after 1829, and given we don't know precisely what the name was nor her origin, that doesn't seem promising to me. But it wouldn't hurt to run some searches at eastern ports (Baltimore, New York, Philadelphia) between the years 1820 and 1829 on variations of her name.

And someone with some time on her hands could log onto newspapers.com (a paid site, but they offer one week trials for free) and see if she has an obituary in 1846. That's a long shot.

Finally, I'd keep returning to The Barquilla de Santa Maria (coldios.org). The current editor, Don Schlegel covers more than records in each newsletter, publishing journals, brief histories, news tidbits. Who knows what might show up?

I hope someone keeps looking. We may not know much about Mary, but we do know this: She married young, bore one son when she was 18, and 16 years after his birth she died, Aug 21, 1845, at age 34. Five months after her death, Myrod married again (Feb 3, 1846) and in July of 1846, Myrod's second wife, Rachel Musselman (who already had a daughter, Jane, father unnamed, born in 1842) gave birth to Mary Ann. It's easy to imagine that Jane's unnamed father was Myrod Bushue and probable that Rachel was pregnant with Mary Ann when she married. I have no clue what was in the hearts and minds of any of the involved parties, but it could well be that Mary Ann's life was not a happy one.